https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46457 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a glassware manufacturing company, in a challenge against the cancellation of an approved price list and revised ground plan by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise. The court cited a Supreme Court decision to support the petitioner's argument that no duty should be payable for printing and decoration done in separate premises. Consequently, the court quashed the orders and consequential proceedings, including show cause notices, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:50:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46457 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a glassware manufacturing company, in a challenge against the cancellation of an approved price list and revised ground plan by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise. The court cited a Supreme Court decision to support the petitioner's argument that no duty should be payable for printing and decoration done in separate premises. Consequently, the court quashed the orders and consequential proceedings, including show cause notices, and made the rule absolute with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46457