<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 768 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463665</link>
    <description>Delay in filing was condoned by the SC, but on review the court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order or proceedings and declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. The civil appeal was dismissed, affirming finality of the underlying civil adjudication. Procedural relief in the form of condonation of delay was granted, but substantive relief sought by the appellant was refused as the grounds presented were inadequate to warrant appellate intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:08:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 768 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463665</link>
      <description>Delay in filing was condoned by the SC, but on review the court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order or proceedings and declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction. The civil appeal was dismissed, affirming finality of the underlying civil adjudication. Procedural relief in the form of condonation of delay was granted, but substantive relief sought by the appellant was refused as the grounds presented were inadequate to warrant appellate intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>