<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46448</link>
    <description>Steel ingots manufactured from cut pieces of bloom rendered into steel melting scrap qualified for exemption under Notification No. 53/64 because the notification covered fresh unused steel melting scrap on which duty had been paid under Item 26 of the First Schedule and no prior set-off had been taken. The Court treated the mutilated or truncated bloom, once converted into melting scrap and used in making steel ingots, as satisfying the notification&#039;s condition, relying on its earlier ruling in the same appellants&#039; case. Exemption was therefore available to the extent of excise duty proved to have been paid on the melting scrap, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46448</link>
      <description>Steel ingots manufactured from cut pieces of bloom rendered into steel melting scrap qualified for exemption under Notification No. 53/64 because the notification covered fresh unused steel melting scrap on which duty had been paid under Item 26 of the First Schedule and no prior set-off had been taken. The Court treated the mutilated or truncated bloom, once converted into melting scrap and used in making steel ingots, as satisfying the notification&#039;s condition, relying on its earlier ruling in the same appellants&#039; case. Exemption was therefore available to the extent of excise duty proved to have been paid on the melting scrap, and the disallowance was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>