<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Challenge to arbitral award dismissed; tribunal may grant pendente lite interest despite contractual prohibition on delayed-payment interest</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92417</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the challenge to the arbitral award and upheld the grant of even pendente lite interest against the respondent. The Court held the arbitral tribunal&#039;s power to award pendente lite interest is not ousted absent an agreement that expressly or by necessary implication bars such relief; a contractual clause prohibiting interest on delayed payments did not, read as a whole, preclude pendente lite interest. The Court found no legal error in the award warranting interference, and post-award interest accorded with the statutory framework extant then. The petition by the appellant seeking impugnation of the award was dismissed and the arbitral award affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Challenge to arbitral award dismissed; tribunal may grant pendente lite interest despite contractual prohibition on delayed-payment interest</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92417</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the challenge to the arbitral award and upheld the grant of even pendente lite interest against the respondent. The Court held the arbitral tribunal&#039;s power to award pendente lite interest is not ousted absent an agreement that expressly or by necessary implication bars such relief; a contractual clause prohibiting interest on delayed payments did not, read as a whole, preclude pendente lite interest. The Court found no legal error in the award warranting interference, and post-award interest accorded with the statutory framework extant then. The petition by the appellant seeking impugnation of the award was dismissed and the arbitral award affirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>