<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal allowed: conveyance and possession of Apartment GBD-00-001 directed to appellants, CIRP recognition prevails over Clause 18.4(xi)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92402</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLAT and NCLT orders, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed and deliver possession of Apartment No. GBD-00-001, Block D, IREO Rise (Gardenia), Mohali to the appellants within two months. The court held the appellants&#039; claim-verified by the resolution professional and incorporated in the published list of creditors prior to plan approval-had full legal recognition under the CIRP and could not lawfully be treated as belated or reduced to a mere refund claim under Clause 18.4(xi). The SC found the lower tribunals misapplied the approved resolution plan and prejudicially relegated bona fide allottees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal allowed: conveyance and possession of Apartment GBD-00-001 directed to appellants, CIRP recognition prevails over Clause 18.4(xi)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92402</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the NCLAT and NCLT orders, and directed the respondent to execute the conveyance deed and deliver possession of Apartment No. GBD-00-001, Block D, IREO Rise (Gardenia), Mohali to the appellants within two months. The court held the appellants&#039; claim-verified by the resolution professional and incorporated in the published list of creditors prior to plan approval-had full legal recognition under the CIRP and could not lawfully be treated as belated or reduced to a mere refund claim under Clause 18.4(xi). The SC found the lower tribunals misapplied the approved resolution plan and prejudicially relegated bona fide allottees.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>