https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778152 ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions relating to cryptocurrency purchases and unexplained cash credits u/s 68, observing the assessee failed to produce detailed documentary evidence and local audit coverage was incomplete. The tribunal found the AO's findings on lack of verification and missing particulars were not adequately considered by the CIT(A), set aside the appellate order, and reinstated the validity of the AO's additions for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778152 ITAT held that the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions relating to cryptocurrency purchases and unexplained cash credits u/s 68, observing the assessee failed to produce detailed documentary evidence and local audit coverage was incomplete. The tribunal found the AO's findings on lack of verification and missing particulars were not adequately considered by the CIT(A), set aside the appellate order, and reinstated the validity of the AO's additions for further proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778152