<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778176</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order under Section 74 was held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal lay under Section 107. The Court found no exceptional ground to bypass the alternate remedy, such as breach of natural justice, violation of fundamental rights, excess of jurisdiction, or a challenge to the statute&#039;s vires. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate forum and directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 08:29:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 665 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778176</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order under Section 74 was held not maintainable because an effective statutory appeal lay under Section 107. The Court found no exceptional ground to bypass the alternate remedy, such as breach of natural justice, violation of fundamental rights, excess of jurisdiction, or a challenge to the statute&#039;s vires. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate forum and directed to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>