<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 101 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46440</link>
    <description>Residual sludge generated during manufacture was found not to be marketable on the evidence, because it was removed in liquid form from pits and no conclusive material showed that it could be sold as a product. As marketability is an essential condition for excisable goods, the sludge could not be treated as liable to excise duty. The finding that marketability was not established was based on appreciation of evidence and constituted a finding of fact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:43:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 101 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46440</link>
      <description>Residual sludge generated during manufacture was found not to be marketable on the evidence, because it was removed in liquid form from pits and no conclusive material showed that it could be sold as a product. As marketability is an essential condition for excisable goods, the sludge could not be treated as liable to excise duty. The finding that marketability was not established was based on appreciation of evidence and constituted a finding of fact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>