<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46438</link>
    <description>A non-statutory advisory letter from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade calling on an importer to pay customs duty and surrender a licence did not amount to a demand notice or show cause notice under the Customs Act, 1962. Because the letter did not create an enforceable liability and no amount had become due and payable in the statutory sense, it could not constitute a tax arrear for the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Scheme applied only where tax arrears were already determined as payable or arose from a statutory notice issued on or before 31 March 1998, so the petitioner was not entitled to its benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 54 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46438</link>
      <description>A non-statutory advisory letter from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade calling on an importer to pay customs duty and surrender a licence did not amount to a demand notice or show cause notice under the Customs Act, 1962. Because the letter did not create an enforceable liability and no amount had become due and payable in the statutory sense, it could not constitute a tax arrear for the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The Scheme applied only where tax arrears were already determined as payable or arose from a statutory notice issued on or before 31 March 1998, so the petitioner was not entitled to its benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>