https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46437 In a challenge to refusal of waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the HC accepted the Tribunal's prima facie finding that the assessee had not shown a sufficient case on limitation or on entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 135/89-C.E., and therefore no basis existed to interfere with the stay conditions. The Court also held that the interim deposit fixed by the Tribunal was not unreasonable on the material before it. While sustaining the refusal to waive pre-deposit and the deposit quantum, the Court extended the time for compliance to 31 January 2001. en-us Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46437 In a challenge to refusal of waiver of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the HC accepted the Tribunal's prima facie finding that the assessee had not shown a sufficient case on limitation or on entitlement to exemption under Notification No. 135/89-C.E., and therefore no basis existed to interfere with the stay conditions. The Court also held that the interim deposit fixed by the Tribunal was not unreasonable on the material before it. While sustaining the refusal to waive pre-deposit and the deposit quantum, the Court extended the time for compliance to 31 January 2001. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46437