<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1743 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463662</link>
    <description>Reimbursable expenses were considered in relation to taxable value under the service tax regime, but their inclusion had to be verified against the facts and the effect of earlier judicial decisions. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, with the appellant given an opportunity to place its case. All issues were left open for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1743 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463662</link>
      <description>Reimbursable expenses were considered in relation to taxable value under the service tax regime, but their inclusion had to be verified against the facts and the effect of earlier judicial decisions. The order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, with the appellant given an opportunity to place its case. All issues were left open for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>