https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463639 Review jurisdiction was confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record, and no such error was shown. The earlier appellate order had treated the issue as no longer res integra because the supporting decision had already attained finality, with the special leave petition against it dismissed. The later disposal of the matter before the Apex Court did not provide any basis to reopen the concluded review exercise. On that footing, the review petition was held not maintainable and failed. en-us Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:00:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463639 Review jurisdiction was confined to correcting an error apparent on the face of the record, and no such error was shown. The earlier appellate order had treated the issue as no longer res integra because the supporting decision had already attained finality, with the special leave petition against it dismissed. The later disposal of the matter before the Apex Court did not provide any basis to reopen the concluded review exercise. On that footing, the review petition was held not maintainable and failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463639