<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1259 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463647</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of addition under s.69C in respect of undisclosed cash payments, finding that daily unaccounted purchases peaked at Rs.18.50 lakh (15 Jan 2010) and noting the taxpayer had already disclosed Rs.30 lakh in the return. The Tribunal confirmed the addition limited to Rs.36,50,000 (declared Rs.30 lakh plus 5% profit), found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1259 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463647</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s restriction of addition under s.69C in respect of undisclosed cash payments, finding that daily unaccounted purchases peaked at Rs.18.50 lakh (15 Jan 2010) and noting the taxpayer had already disclosed Rs.30 lakh in the return. The Tribunal confirmed the addition limited to Rs.36,50,000 (declared Rs.30 lakh plus 5% profit), found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>