<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (10) TMI 1540 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463652</link>
    <description>ITAT, Mumbai held that adjustment under s.50C relating to adoption of stamp duty valuation cannot be effected by the Centralized Processing Centre under s.143(1); such deeming provision requires opportunity to object (including reference to DVO) and therefore can only be processed under s.143(3). The proposed addition under s.50C is beyond the mandate of s.143(1), and the matter is remitted to the file of the jurisdictional AO for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (10) TMI 1540 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463652</link>
      <description>ITAT, Mumbai held that adjustment under s.50C relating to adoption of stamp duty valuation cannot be effected by the Centralized Processing Centre under s.143(1); such deeming provision requires opportunity to object (including reference to DVO) and therefore can only be processed under s.143(3). The proposed addition under s.50C is beyond the mandate of s.143(1), and the matter is remitted to the file of the jurisdictional AO for adjudication in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>