https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46429 The High Court of Delhi allowed the petitions challenging orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found that the orders were passed mechanically without proper consideration of individual cases, lacking detailed reasoning and a quasi-judicial approach. Consequently, the Court quashed the orders, remanded the matters for fresh consideration, and directed the Commissioner to reevaluate the applications in accordance with the law. No coercive steps for demand recovery were permitted until the fresh decision, and the petitioners were awarded costs of Rs. 5,000 in each case. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:23:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46429 The High Court of Delhi allowed the petitions challenging orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found that the orders were passed mechanically without proper consideration of individual cases, lacking detailed reasoning and a quasi-judicial approach. Consequently, the Court quashed the orders, remanded the matters for fresh consideration, and directed the Commissioner to reevaluate the applications in accordance with the law. No coercive steps for demand recovery were permitted until the fresh decision, and the petitioners were awarded costs of Rs. 5,000 in each case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46429