https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46425 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the preliminary findings dated 16-1-2002 and the constitutionality of Rule 7 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. It held that the petitioners were not prejudiced by procedural irregularities, and the preliminary findings were not binding. The court upheld the validity of Rule 7, emphasizing the designated authority's duty to act within the statutory framework. en-us Wed, 15 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:16:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46425 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the preliminary findings dated 16-1-2002 and the constitutionality of Rule 7 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. It held that the petitioners were not prejudiced by procedural irregularities, and the preliminary findings were not binding. The court upheld the validity of Rule 7, emphasizing the designated authority's duty to act within the statutory framework. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46425