https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46424 The High Court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's decision, citing jurisdictional errors, misdirection in law, and violation of natural justice principles. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, directing an independent decision based on evidence. The petitioner was instructed to provide an agreement with a specific company to assess potential excise duty evasion. The Court emphasized that the existence of an alternative remedy does not preclude jurisdiction under Article 226 when fundamental issues are raised. The petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:13:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46424 The High Court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's decision, citing jurisdictional errors, misdirection in law, and violation of natural justice principles. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, directing an independent decision based on evidence. The petitioner was instructed to provide an agreement with a specific company to assess potential excise duty evasion. The Court emphasized that the existence of an alternative remedy does not preclude jurisdiction under Article 226 when fundamental issues are raised. The petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 14 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46424