<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Order under Section 73 set aside for lack of formal authenticated SCN as required by Rule 142(1)(a), natural justice breached</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92393</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 28.04.2024, holding that proceedings under Section 73 were vitiated for failure to issue a formal, authenticated show-cause notice (SCN) as mandated by Section 73 and Rule 142(1)(a); a summary in FORM GST DRC-01 or an attached statement of tax determination cannot substitute for a proper SCN. The court found breach of principles of natural justice where the Summary and attachments in GST DRC-01/DRC-07 lacked proper authentication and did not afford a meaningful opportunity to respond. The respondents were granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings de novo under Section 73 if deemed appropriate. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Order under Section 73 set aside for lack of formal authenticated SCN as required by Rule 142(1)(a), natural justice breached</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92393</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 28.04.2024, holding that proceedings under Section 73 were vitiated for failure to issue a formal, authenticated show-cause notice (SCN) as mandated by Section 73 and Rule 142(1)(a); a summary in FORM GST DRC-01 or an attached statement of tax determination cannot substitute for a proper SCN. The court found breach of principles of natural justice where the Summary and attachments in GST DRC-01/DRC-07 lacked proper authentication and did not afford a meaningful opportunity to respond. The respondents were granted liberty to initiate fresh proceedings de novo under Section 73 if deemed appropriate. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>