<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petition allowed and remanded; delay excused as CA family function, audit credible, s.119(2)(b) return accepted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92385</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petition and directed remand: finding that the petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the return arose from the chartered accountant&#039;s family function and not from mala fides, the Court held the audit report and reported losses credible and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement under the Act substantive rather than forfeitable on technical grounds; accordingly the respondent&#039;s earlier rejection of the s.119(2)(b) application was set aside and the matter remitted to the respondent to pass a fresh, reasoned order condoning the delay and accepting the belated return so the petitioner may avail the statutory benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petition allowed and remanded; delay excused as CA family function, audit credible, s.119(2)(b) return accepted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92385</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petition and directed remand: finding that the petitioner&#039;s delay in filing the return arose from the chartered accountant&#039;s family function and not from mala fides, the Court held the audit report and reported losses credible and the petitioner&#039;s entitlement under the Act substantive rather than forfeitable on technical grounds; accordingly the respondent&#039;s earlier rejection of the s.119(2)(b) application was set aside and the matter remitted to the respondent to pass a fresh, reasoned order condoning the delay and accepting the belated return so the petitioner may avail the statutory benefits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>