https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92383 The ITAT upheld the assessed total income at Rs.1,10,70,33,060/- but partly allowed the assessee's appeal: it directed the AO to reduce an inadvertently offered additional income of Rs.1.14 crore (pertaining to AY 2010-11) from the assessment, and ordered deletion of a duplicate addition in AY 2010-11 which would have resulted in double taxation. The Tribunal affirmed that declared return income cannot be reduced. It allowed deduction of losses on forward commodity contracts as business expenditure under s.37(1) (held to be non-speculative hedging), and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions disallowing revenue appeals against characterization of loan processing charges and foreign-currency hedging premium. Revenue's grounds were dismissed. en-us Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92383 The ITAT upheld the assessed total income at Rs.1,10,70,33,060/- but partly allowed the assessee's appeal: it directed the AO to reduce an inadvertently offered additional income of Rs.1.14 crore (pertaining to AY 2010-11) from the assessment, and ordered deletion of a duplicate addition in AY 2010-11 which would have resulted in double taxation. The Tribunal affirmed that declared return income cannot be reduced. It allowed deduction of losses on forward commodity contracts as business expenditure under s.37(1) (held to be non-speculative hedging), and upheld the CIT(A)'s deletions disallowing revenue appeals against characterization of loan processing charges and foreign-currency hedging premium. Revenue's grounds were dismissed. Highlights Income Tax Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92383