<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax body sets guarantee fee at 0.5% instead of 0.2% and upholds aircraft depreciation and maintenance deductions</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92377</link>
    <description>The ITAT modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order on transfer-pricing adjustment for a corporate guarantee: rejecting the CIT(A)&#039;s adoption of a 0.2% guarantee fee, the Tribunal directed the AO to sustain an addition at 0.5% of the guarantee value, partially allowing Revenue&#039;s ground. Regarding disallowance of aircraft depreciation and maintenance, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s factual finding that relevant logbooks and movement sheets were produced to the AO and CIT(A); Revenue&#039;s challenge was not maintained as it did not properly contest the finding as perverse. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of those expenses stands and no further disallowance is directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax body sets guarantee fee at 0.5% instead of 0.2% and upholds aircraft depreciation and maintenance deductions</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92377</link>
      <description>The ITAT modified the CIT(A)&#039;s order on transfer-pricing adjustment for a corporate guarantee: rejecting the CIT(A)&#039;s adoption of a 0.2% guarantee fee, the Tribunal directed the AO to sustain an addition at 0.5% of the guarantee value, partially allowing Revenue&#039;s ground. Regarding disallowance of aircraft depreciation and maintenance, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s factual finding that relevant logbooks and movement sheets were produced to the AO and CIT(A); Revenue&#039;s challenge was not maintained as it did not properly contest the finding as perverse. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of those expenses stands and no further disallowance is directed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>