https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46415 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal complaints should ordinarily not be exercised when the trial has substantially progressed and the accused can still raise their objections before the trial court. Where prosecution evidence has already been recorded and the matter is nearing conclusion, the High Court should avoid entering into the merits of the allegations or making findings that may prejudice either side. The availability of an effective remedy before the trial court weighs against intervention under inherent powers, and the petitioners must pursue their defences in that forum. On those grounds, quashing was declined. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:02:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46415 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal complaints should ordinarily not be exercised when the trial has substantially progressed and the accused can still raise their objections before the trial court. Where prosecution evidence has already been recorded and the matter is nearing conclusion, the High Court should avoid entering into the merits of the allegations or making findings that may prejudice either side. The availability of an effective remedy before the trial court weighs against intervention under inherent powers, and the petitioners must pursue their defences in that forum. On those grounds, quashing was declined. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46415