<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 543 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778054</link>
    <description>The SC refused to entertain review/recall, affirming that the scope of review is limited and no error apparent on the face of the record existed. The HC had found the relied-upon order attained finality as of 27.11.2019, and the SC was not inclined to interfere. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 543 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778054</link>
      <description>The SC refused to entertain review/recall, affirming that the scope of review is limited and no error apparent on the face of the record existed. The HC had found the relied-upon order attained finality as of 27.11.2019, and the SC was not inclined to interfere. The special leave petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>