<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 545 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778056</link>
    <description>CESTAT affirmed that interest on delayed payment of service tax for April 2009-January 2010 is payable as a statutory liability and the interest demand is sustained. The tribunal also upheld recovery of the late fee under Section 70, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s challenge and that procedural penalty/levy cannot be waived. Reliance on precedent was noted but did not alter the outcome. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 545 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778056</link>
      <description>CESTAT affirmed that interest on delayed payment of service tax for April 2009-January 2010 is payable as a statutory liability and the interest demand is sustained. The tribunal also upheld recovery of the late fee under Section 70, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s challenge and that procedural penalty/levy cannot be waived. Reliance on precedent was noted but did not alter the outcome. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>