https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778065 HC declined to interfere with the communication permitting provisional release of goods and directing the petitioner to join the investigation. The court found the petitioner's claim of local manufacture contradicted by labels stating foreign origin, and noted absence of invoices and possession of large quantities. Given the misdeclaration concerns and public interest in accurate origin marks, the HC upheld the impugned order dated 10 June 2025. The petitioner remains free to participate in the investigation and seek assessment or statutory release in accordance with law. Petition disposed. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778065 HC declined to interfere with the communication permitting provisional release of goods and directing the petitioner to join the investigation. The court found the petitioner's claim of local manufacture contradicted by labels stating foreign origin, and noted absence of invoices and possession of large quantities. Given the misdeclaration concerns and public interest in accurate origin marks, the HC upheld the impugned order dated 10 June 2025. The petitioner remains free to participate in the investigation and seek assessment or statutory release in accordance with law. Petition disposed. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778065