<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 593 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778104</link>
    <description>The mandatory pre-deposit for filing an appeal under the CGST regime can be satisfied through utilisation of credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger, and a cash-only view is contrary to the settled position. On that basis, rejection of the appeal for alleged non-compliance was not sustained, and the pre-deposit was treated as duly made through the Electronic Credit Ledger. The appeal was restored to the Appellate Authority for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:39:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 593 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778104</link>
      <description>The mandatory pre-deposit for filing an appeal under the CGST regime can be satisfied through utilisation of credit in the Electronic Credit Ledger, and a cash-only view is contrary to the settled position. On that basis, rejection of the appeal for alleged non-compliance was not sustained, and the pre-deposit was treated as duly made through the Electronic Credit Ledger. The appeal was restored to the Appellate Authority for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>