<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46409</link>
    <description>The court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition challenging the initiation of anti-dumping investigation on Polyester Staple Fibre imports. It found no jurisdictional error in the initiation, as the Designated Authority had sufficient evidence of dumping and injury. The evidence provided was deemed accurate and adequate, complying with natural justice principles. The court also validated the confidentiality rule protecting sensitive information. Ultimately, both writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the Designated Authority&#039;s actions and the validity of the confidentiality provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 17:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 68 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46409</link>
      <description>The court upheld the maintainability of the writ petition challenging the initiation of anti-dumping investigation on Polyester Staple Fibre imports. It found no jurisdictional error in the initiation, as the Designated Authority had sufficient evidence of dumping and injury. The evidence provided was deemed accurate and adequate, complying with natural justice principles. The court also validated the confidentiality rule protecting sensitive information. Ultimately, both writ petitions were dismissed, affirming the Designated Authority&#039;s actions and the validity of the confidentiality provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>