<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 2036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463621</link>
    <description>The HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 and the legality of enhancing turnover based on the difference between sale price and purchase price. It did not decide the merits of those tax issues at this stage. Instead, it granted interim protection against recovery of the disputed demand, subject to deposit of 50% of the amount within the stipulated time and furnishing security for the balance to the satisfaction of the assessing authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:02:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 2036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463621</link>
      <description>The HC admitted the appeal on substantial questions of law concerning input tax credit under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 and the legality of enhancing turnover based on the difference between sale price and purchase price. It did not decide the merits of those tax issues at this stage. Instead, it granted interim protection against recovery of the disputed demand, subject to deposit of 50% of the amount within the stipulated time and furnishing security for the balance to the satisfaction of the assessing authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>