<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46387</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order is not invalid merely because it refers to earlier quashed detention orders, where those orders are not part of the material forming the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. The court treated the references to prior detention history as background narration only, and found that reliance was placed on the contemporaneous incident and the statements and documents specifically identified as the basis of detention. On that footing, the challenge failed and the detention order was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:16:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 90 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46387</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order is not invalid merely because it refers to earlier quashed detention orders, where those orders are not part of the material forming the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction. The court treated the references to prior detention history as background narration only, and found that reliance was placed on the contemporaneous incident and the statements and documents specifically identified as the basis of detention. On that footing, the challenge failed and the detention order was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>