<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 492 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778003</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA upheld deletion of additions under s.68 made in an assessment framed u/s 153A, holding that where assessments are non-abated/completed, additions can be sustained only on the basis of incriminating material actually found and seized during the search. The tribunal followed the controlling SC precedent and agreed with the CIT(A) that, in absence of seized incriminating material, the addition was unsustainable. Decision rendered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 492 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778003</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA upheld deletion of additions under s.68 made in an assessment framed u/s 153A, holding that where assessments are non-abated/completed, additions can be sustained only on the basis of incriminating material actually found and seized during the search. The tribunal followed the controlling SC precedent and agreed with the CIT(A) that, in absence of seized incriminating material, the addition was unsustainable. Decision rendered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>