<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 493 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778004</link>
    <description>Capital gains timing under a development agreement depended on whether tax was attracted in the year of execution or only when possession of the constructed flat was received. The tribunal did not decide the merits on taxability; it set aside the matter and remanded it to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision after examining the evidence and the agreement terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 493 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778004</link>
      <description>Capital gains timing under a development agreement depended on whether tax was attracted in the year of execution or only when possession of the constructed flat was received. The tribunal did not decide the merits on taxability; it set aside the matter and remanded it to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision after examining the evidence and the agreement terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>