<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 495 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778006</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, set aside the CIT(A) order, and directed the AO to allow the deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d). The tribunal held that section 80P is a benevolent provision to be read liberally; absence of interest income from an RBI-licensed co-operative bank does not disqualify the deduction. Ambiguities must be resolved in favor of the assessee, so denial by implication was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 495 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778006</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeal, set aside the CIT(A) order, and directed the AO to allow the deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d). The tribunal held that section 80P is a benevolent provision to be read liberally; absence of interest income from an RBI-licensed co-operative bank does not disqualify the deduction. Ambiguities must be resolved in favor of the assessee, so denial by implication was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>