<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778010</link>
    <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT set aside the CIT(E) order rejecting registration u/s 12AB and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The tribunal found the Form-10AB was filed late but noted legislative amendments and CBDT circulars caused genuine confusion; the assessee submitted reasons and evidence of charitable activity. The CIT(E) failed to address the explanation for delay or consider merits. The file is returned to CIT(E) for a fresh hearing on the delay and merits; the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 499 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778010</link>
      <description>ITAT HYDERABAD - AT set aside the CIT(E) order rejecting registration u/s 12AB and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The tribunal found the Form-10AB was filed late but noted legislative amendments and CBDT circulars caused genuine confusion; the assessee submitted reasons and evidence of charitable activity. The CIT(E) failed to address the explanation for delay or consider merits. The file is returned to CIT(E) for a fresh hearing on the delay and merits; the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>