<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778016</link>
    <description>ITAT (Delhi) allowed the appeal, holding the assessee entitled to exemption for leave encashment under s.10(10AA) up to the revised CBDT limit of Rs.2,500,000. The AO&#039;s denial based on employment with a bank (not central/state government) was set aside because the claimed amount fell below the revised exempt threshold. The AO was directed to allow the deduction within the prescribed limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 505 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778016</link>
      <description>ITAT (Delhi) allowed the appeal, holding the assessee entitled to exemption for leave encashment under s.10(10AA) up to the revised CBDT limit of Rs.2,500,000. The AO&#039;s denial based on employment with a bank (not central/state government) was set aside because the claimed amount fell below the revised exempt threshold. The AO was directed to allow the deduction within the prescribed limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>