<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 526 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778037</link>
    <description>The SC rejected respondents&#039; objection to maintainability, found the Settlement Commission had not given reasons for reducing interest only by 50% and not waiving it entirely for AY 1989-90, accepted the writ petition and waived interest under s.234A, but refused to waive interest under s.234B and s.234C. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and consequential applications concerning abatement, condonation of delay and substitution required no separate orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=849041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 526 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778037</link>
      <description>The SC rejected respondents&#039; objection to maintainability, found the Settlement Commission had not given reasons for reducing interest only by 50% and not waiving it entirely for AY 1989-90, accepted the writ petition and waived interest under s.234A, but refused to waive interest under s.234B and s.234C. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and consequential applications concerning abatement, condonation of delay and substitution required no separate orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>