https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778044 HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 which had rejected the appeal solely on delay. The petitioner is directed to produce invoices and corroborative material within two months to substantiate exemption of GST on certain rice items. The competent authority must fix an oral hearing, consider the material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication consistent with these directions. en-us Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Sep 2025 08:38:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778044 HC allowed the petition, set aside the impugned orders dated 15.04.2025, 27.04.2024 and 28.04.2024 which had rejected the appeal solely on delay. The petitioner is directed to produce invoices and corroborative material within two months to substantiate exemption of GST on certain rice items. The competent authority must fix an oral hearing, consider the material, and pass a fresh speaking order within four months. The matter is remitted for fresh adjudication consistent with these directions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=778044