<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 94 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46373</link>
    <description>An exemption notification limited to goods classifiable under Tariff Entry 4823.90 could not be claimed for goods falling under different tariff entries. The settled classification position applied to the goods in question meant they did not satisfy the notification&#039;s specific condition for exemption. As a result, the exemption benefit under Notification No. 135/89 was unavailable, and the challenge to denial of the benefit failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 94 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46373</link>
      <description>An exemption notification limited to goods classifiable under Tariff Entry 4823.90 could not be claimed for goods falling under different tariff entries. The settled classification position applied to the goods in question meant they did not satisfy the notification&#039;s specific condition for exemption. As a result, the exemption benefit under Notification No. 135/89 was unavailable, and the challenge to denial of the benefit failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>