<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1454 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463594</link>
    <description>Appellant had already reversed the inadmissible CENVAT credit on SAD along with interest, as recorded by the adjudicating authority; consequently the show-cause proceedings were unnecessary and void ab initio. The tribunal held the sole issue was reversal of inadmissible credit, not discrepancies in revised returns, and found the impugned order unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 18:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1454 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463594</link>
      <description>Appellant had already reversed the inadmissible CENVAT credit on SAD along with interest, as recorded by the adjudicating authority; consequently the show-cause proceedings were unnecessary and void ab initio. The tribunal held the sole issue was reversal of inadmissible credit, not discrepancies in revised returns, and found the impugned order unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>