<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46366</link>
    <description>Section 35 of the Central Excise Act prescribes an appeal period of sixty days, with a further thirty-day extension on sufficient cause. The commentary states that the provision does not expressly exclude Section 5 read with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, so delay beyond the initial period may still be considered for condonation where sufficient cause is shown. It also emphasises that &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should be construed liberally to avoid defeating substantive justice by technical delay, and that bona fide explanations should generally lead to hearing the appeal on merits rather than rejection on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:30:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 109 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46366</link>
      <description>Section 35 of the Central Excise Act prescribes an appeal period of sixty days, with a further thirty-day extension on sufficient cause. The commentary states that the provision does not expressly exclude Section 5 read with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, so delay beyond the initial period may still be considered for condonation where sufficient cause is shown. It also emphasises that &quot;sufficient cause&quot; should be construed liberally to avoid defeating substantive justice by technical delay, and that bona fide explanations should generally lead to hearing the appeal on merits rather than rejection on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>