<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46364</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Condition No. 4B(ii) of Notification No. 88/2000, finding it to be in the public interest and not violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner failed to prove that the condition was against the public interest or discriminatory. The court emphasized the Central Government&#039;s power to impose such conditions under Section 25 of the Customs Act for preventing misuse of concessional duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:25:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 114 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46364</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of Condition No. 4B(ii) of Notification No. 88/2000, finding it to be in the public interest and not violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner failed to prove that the condition was against the public interest or discriminatory. The court emphasized the Central Government&#039;s power to impose such conditions under Section 25 of the Customs Act for preventing misuse of concessional duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>