<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Adjudication quashed for breach of natural justice where show-cause notice failed to disclose materials, demand of Rs.40,37,877 set aside</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92331</link>
    <description>The HC held that the adjudicatory process was vitiated for breach of natural justice because the show-cause notice failed to disclose the materials underpinning the allegation of tax evasion, depriving the petitioner of an opportunity to reply; such procedural infirmity is incurable at appellate stages. Consequently, the adjudicating authority&#039;s rectification order dated 16.10.2023 insofar as it confirmed a demand of Rs. 40,37,877/- was set aside and quashed; the appellate authority&#039;s order dated 17.02.2025 upholding that finding and the consequent demand notice of 17.02.2025 were likewise set aside and quashed. The writ petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Adjudication quashed for breach of natural justice where show-cause notice failed to disclose materials, demand of Rs.40,37,877 set aside</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92331</link>
      <description>The HC held that the adjudicatory process was vitiated for breach of natural justice because the show-cause notice failed to disclose the materials underpinning the allegation of tax evasion, depriving the petitioner of an opportunity to reply; such procedural infirmity is incurable at appellate stages. Consequently, the adjudicating authority&#039;s rectification order dated 16.10.2023 insofar as it confirmed a demand of Rs. 40,37,877/- was set aside and quashed; the appellate authority&#039;s order dated 17.02.2025 upholding that finding and the consequent demand notice of 17.02.2025 were likewise set aside and quashed. The writ petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>