<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inadvertent clerical errors corrected under s.149 Customs Act cannot extinguish exporters&#039; substantive MEIS entitlement; PRC must process amended shipping bills</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92311</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, holding that inadvertent clerical errors in shipping bills corrected under s.149 of the Customs Act cannot extinguish an exporter&#039;s substantive entitlement under the MEIS. Distinguishing procedural formalities from substantive rights, the Court found the PRC&#039;s unexplained, unheard rejection violated principles of natural justice and frustrated the beneficial object of Chapter 3 of the FTP. The SC set aside the High Court&#039;s order, quashed the PRC&#039;s rejection, and directed the Respondents to process the Appellant&#039;s MEIS claim on the basis of the amended shipping bills and to pass orders in accordance with law within twelve weeks. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Inadvertent clerical errors corrected under s.149 Customs Act cannot extinguish exporters&#039; substantive MEIS entitlement; PRC must process amended shipping bills</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92311</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, holding that inadvertent clerical errors in shipping bills corrected under s.149 of the Customs Act cannot extinguish an exporter&#039;s substantive entitlement under the MEIS. Distinguishing procedural formalities from substantive rights, the Court found the PRC&#039;s unexplained, unheard rejection violated principles of natural justice and frustrated the beneficial object of Chapter 3 of the FTP. The SC set aside the High Court&#039;s order, quashed the PRC&#039;s rejection, and directed the Respondents to process the Appellant&#039;s MEIS claim on the basis of the amended shipping bills and to pass orders in accordance with law within twelve weeks. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>