<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 399 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777910</link>
    <description>Section 173(5) of the CrPC applies to police-report cases and cannot be invoked in a prosecution launched by private complaint under the Central Excise Act. A later adjudication order that materially changes the foundation of liability cannot be introduced into a pending prosecution unless it was placed before the sanctioning authority and supported by fresh sanction where required. Permitting marking of such a later order under Section 294 CrPC is impermissible if it alters the substratum of the complaint and was not part of the basis for prosecution. The revision was therefore allowed, while the complainant was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 399 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777910</link>
      <description>Section 173(5) of the CrPC applies to police-report cases and cannot be invoked in a prosecution launched by private complaint under the Central Excise Act. A later adjudication order that materially changes the foundation of liability cannot be introduced into a pending prosecution unless it was placed before the sanctioning authority and supported by fresh sanction where required. Permitting marking of such a later order under Section 294 CrPC is impermissible if it alters the substratum of the complaint and was not part of the basis for prosecution. The revision was therefore allowed, while the complainant was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>