<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 402 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777913</link>
    <description>Where a fiscal statute prescribes an appeal period of two months from receipt of the adjudication order and allows condonation only for a further one month on sufficient cause, the appellate authority cannot enlarge time beyond that outer statutory limit. The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) having been filed after expiry of the condonable period, it was treated as time-barred and not maintainable. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal on limitation and accepted that the statutory ceiling on condonation could not be ed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 402 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777913</link>
      <description>Where a fiscal statute prescribes an appeal period of two months from receipt of the adjudication order and allows condonation only for a further one month on sufficient cause, the appellate authority cannot enlarge time beyond that outer statutory limit. The appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) having been filed after expiry of the condonable period, it was treated as time-barred and not maintainable. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal on limitation and accepted that the statutory ceiling on condonation could not be ed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>