https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777917 At the discharge and charge-framing stage in a PMLA prosecution, the court considers only whether the prosecution material discloses sufficient grounds and a prima facie case; it cannot conduct a mini trial, weigh the defence on merits, or reappreciate evidence in revision. Revisional interference lies only for patent illegality, jurisdictional defect, or a groundless charge. Applying that standard, the High Court found no perversity in the orders rejecting discharge and framing charge, and held that witness statements, documents, suspicious share transfers, and company structures showed enough material to proceed. The absence of the petitioners' names in the predicate offence was not conclusive, as money-laundering is an independent and continuing offence. en-us Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777917 At the discharge and charge-framing stage in a PMLA prosecution, the court considers only whether the prosecution material discloses sufficient grounds and a prima facie case; it cannot conduct a mini trial, weigh the defence on merits, or reappreciate evidence in revision. Revisional interference lies only for patent illegality, jurisdictional defect, or a groundless charge. Applying that standard, the High Court found no perversity in the orders rejecting discharge and framing charge, and held that witness statements, documents, suspicious share transfers, and company structures showed enough material to proceed. The absence of the petitioners' names in the predicate offence was not conclusive, as money-laundering is an independent and continuing offence. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777917