<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46356</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the erroneous order of the Tribunal dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on an incorrect application of the principle of merger. The Court clarified that the principle of merger did not apply as the appeal challenged various aspects of the order. It was revealed that the appellant had made the necessary deposit before the appeal was struck off the register. The Court restored the appeal for consideration on its merits by the Tribunal, ultimately allowing the appeal with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46356</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the erroneous order of the Tribunal dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal based on an incorrect application of the principle of merger. The Court clarified that the principle of merger did not apply as the appeal challenged various aspects of the order. It was revealed that the appellant had made the necessary deposit before the appeal was struck off the register. The Court restored the appeal for consideration on its merits by the Tribunal, ultimately allowing the appeal with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>