<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 426 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777937</link>
    <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT allowed the appeal, holding that the AO&#039;s rejection of books and imposition of a 10% addition on gross receipts for a business dealing in purchase and sale of liquor was unsupported by comparable cases and rested on conjecture. The tribunal found the CIT(A) erred in upholding that addition, set aside the CIT(A) order, and directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 426 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777937</link>
      <description>ITAT KOLKATA - AT allowed the appeal, holding that the AO&#039;s rejection of books and imposition of a 10% addition on gross receipts for a business dealing in purchase and sale of liquor was unsupported by comparable cases and rested on conjecture. The tribunal found the CIT(A) erred in upholding that addition, set aside the CIT(A) order, and directed the AO to delete the addition, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>