<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46355</link>
    <description>An ex-works sale remained valued at the factory gate because delivery was made before despatch, payment was received in advance and risk passed to the buyer when goods were handed to the carrier. Section 4 of the Central Excise Act fixes assessable value by reference to the place of removal, and on these facts the factory premises, not the buyer&#039;s premises, was that place. The seller&#039;s arrangement of transit insurance at the buyer&#039;s request did not by itself show retention of title, since insurance of another&#039;s interest is legally possible. Freight and transit insurance were therefore not includible in assessable value, and the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 96 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46355</link>
      <description>An ex-works sale remained valued at the factory gate because delivery was made before despatch, payment was received in advance and risk passed to the buyer when goods were handed to the carrier. Section 4 of the Central Excise Act fixes assessable value by reference to the place of removal, and on these facts the factory premises, not the buyer&#039;s premises, was that place. The seller&#039;s arrangement of transit insurance at the buyer&#039;s request did not by itself show retention of title, since insurance of another&#039;s interest is legally possible. Freight and transit insurance were therefore not includible in assessable value, and the duty demand and penalty could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=46355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>