<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777949</link>
    <description>ITAT (DELHI) allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty under s.271A for failure to maintain books, finding reasonable cause in the assessee&#039;s reliance on ICAI guidance for computing F&amp;O turnover. The tribunal held the Income Tax Act lacks specific provision for F&amp;O turnover, that reliance on the professional guidance justified non-maintenance of books, and the penalty imposed by the AO was unwarranted under s.274.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 438 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777949</link>
      <description>ITAT (DELHI) allowed the appeal and set aside the penalty under s.271A for failure to maintain books, finding reasonable cause in the assessee&#039;s reliance on ICAI guidance for computing F&amp;O turnover. The tribunal held the Income Tax Act lacks specific provision for F&amp;O turnover, that reliance on the professional guidance justified non-maintenance of books, and the penalty imposed by the AO was unwarranted under s.274.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>