<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 440 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777951</link>
    <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held receipts under a facility agreement and CAM services are taxable as &quot;Income from Business&quot; (not House Property) and directed the AO to compute accordingly. Deduction of municipal taxes under proviso to s.23 was restored to the AO for verification and allowance. Claims for interest (including pre-EMI) and for non-deduction of TDS were remitted to the AO for de novo adjudication after the assessee furnishes supporting material. Insurance premium paid as condition of a business loan was allowed as business expenditure. Addition to annual letting value for a related-party lease was remitted for fresh comparison; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 13:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=848804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 440 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777951</link>
      <description>ITAT MUMBAI - AT held receipts under a facility agreement and CAM services are taxable as &quot;Income from Business&quot; (not House Property) and directed the AO to compute accordingly. Deduction of municipal taxes under proviso to s.23 was restored to the AO for verification and allowance. Claims for interest (including pre-EMI) and for non-deduction of TDS were remitted to the AO for de novo adjudication after the assessee furnishes supporting material. Insurance premium paid as condition of a business loan was allowed as business expenditure. Addition to annual letting value for a related-party lease was remitted for fresh comparison; appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>